Re: [-empyre-] why i surf net.art
At 13:06 +1000 10/7/02, j.abbate@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
Am I detecting a faint nostalgia for the 2400 baud modem? Isn't the
only difference the arbitrary imposition of an online speed limit
that is going to change with the next technological advance anyway?
I am interested in this phenomena: the often utopic rhetoric of so
much new media work is negated by a somewhat purist adherence to, or
fetishisation of, the current technological conditions. What say?
i think this is slipping off topic but yes and no. i sometimes teach
students from the developing world in a first world nation and i
guess something i want them to know is that they have to accept
bandwidth as a positive creative restraint otherwise they simply
won't get their heads around work that is relevant to why they're
doing this in the first place (to make stuff for home).
i guess i dont' see the terms as problematic in this sense, in much
the same way that i'd say a painter who today uses canvas needs to
somewhere think about this as a positive material constraint in their
practice, otherwise use something else, and if you're nostalgic for
frescos, go paint one :-) and yes it's still painting but don't
complain that you can't exhibit it in that gallery over there.
cheers
adrian miles
--
+ lecturer in new media and cinema studies
[http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog]
+ interactive desktop video developer [http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/]
+ hypertext rmit [http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au]
+ InterMedia:UiB. university of bergen [http://www.intermedia.uib.no]
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.